SHATTERING STEREOSTYPES
Kelly Nash hopes to jump-
start her academic career
with a doctorate in physics
By PAULA ALLEN
Photography JANET ROGERS
KELLY
NASH
Age: 28.
Occupation: Physics instructor/doctoral
student.
Why she’s a Role Model: One of few
African-American women currently pursuing
a doctorate in physics, she ignores
the statistics to work in a field that fascinates
her.
Personal: Single-but-looking; no pets —
“I can’t even keep a plant alive.”
Goals: To teach at a minority-serving
institution.
Believes in: “Doing everything a little
differently.”
Favorite relaxation strategies: Yoga
and Pilates, done at home to suit her
busy schedule.
People would be surprised that I …”Love shoes. I have to wear flat shoes
(for comfort and safety) in the lab, but I
love shopping for cute shoes, even if I
don’t get to wear them much.”
What she’s reading: Black Women in the
Academy: Promises and Perils, by Lois
Benjamin; essays by academics and administrators
on their professional experience.
When people ask Kelly Nash
what she does, her answer
shatters stereotypes.
She’s a woman. She’s
African-American. She’s pretty. She
dresses like a young urban sophisticate.
And she’s a physicist. That is, a teaching
assistant and research assistant who was
one of the first doctoral students in
physics at UTSA.
“Usually, people are speechless at
first,” she says, laughing. “The one
thing they say most often is, ‘You must
be very smart.’ But I don’t consider
myself extraordinary.”
She is, though, especially when you
consider the statistics. A 2003 study
showed that of 4,228 physics doctoral
degrees awarded that year, only 12 went
to African-Americans, and only a few of
these graduates were women.
Things haven’t changed that much
since then. In professional contexts, Nash
is used to being the only person in the
room who looks like her. At 28, she looks
years younger. On the first day of the
Introductory Physics lab she taught last year, students asked her before class, “Do you know anything about Ms.
Nash? What’s she like?” mistaking her
for a first-year peer.
At scientific conferences, too, Nash
often is mistaken for an undergraduate,
though she took a few years off to work
between completing her master’s degree
at the University of Michigan and starting
her doctoral studies. She also is frequently
the only member of a minority
group attending presentations at conferences.
In her master’s program, she
became aware that there were professors
who didn’t want to be advisors to
women, whom they believed to be less
competitive than male students.
“I try not to mind,” she says. “I have
to keep (my minority status) in perspective.
I don’t try to overextend myself, but
I want my presence known, so I can serve
as a living example.”
For either gender or any ethnicity,
physics “is never easy.” In her freshman
year of college at Dillard University in
New Orleans — her hometown — there
were 20 students who thought they
wanted to major in physics. “Only two,
the other girl and I, graduated as physics
majors,” Nash says.
To those who would ask why she has
chosen a nontraditional career for a
woman, she would answer, “Why not?”
As she says, “I can lift heavy equipment
and use tools.” She doesn’t mind wearing
safety goggles when she works in a
chemistry lab, and she doesn’t have to
wear a white coat.
Through her studies, she has met
other women in the field who also defy
stereotyping. “Most of the women are
really hip,” she says. “They dress well;
they’re not lost in the last decade.
They’re busy, but they work hard to balance
work and social life and family.”
Though her parents aren’t scientists,
she believes they had a lot of influence on
her career choice. “Education is important
to my family,” she says. Her maternal
grandfather, a biologist who worked in
labs at a Veterans Administration hospital
and at the Tuskegee University School of
Veterinary Medicine, was a role model, as
were her parents.
Her father, an accountant who was the
first of his family to go to college, “offered
us every opportunity to succeed.” Nash’s
mother, a university administrator, gave
her another push in a scientific direction
when she signed her daughter up for
computer camp one summer.
At private Catholic schools, including
an all-girls’ junior and senior high school, “most of my teachers were women,”
Nash says. “I got a strong science background
and experience with very strong
women as teachers.”
Though she considered majoring in
biology or even history, Nash chose
physics as her undergraduate major. “Physics is the foundation of all the sciences,”
she says. “The beauty of physics
is that you start with a few basic equations,
from which you can devise others,
to get to something completely new.”
After earning her master’s, she decided
to work for a while, teaching math in
a New Orleans high school for a year and
a half. As a teacher of Algebra II and
other math courses, Nash often heard
students protest, “Why do we have to
learn math? We’ll never use it.”
That gave her the idea to “integrate
things we see in life into a multidisciplinary
approach to math,” she says. “Math is everywhere — art, business,
even the weather.” She encouraged her
students to keep journals and bring in
examples of hidden math in action. “If
we want more people to become science
majors,” she says, “we have to consider
the way we teach math, and that needs
to start at the elementary level. We need
to be creative to keep kids interested.”
When Nash was ready to return to
graduate school, once again, she wanted
to try something new. Although she had
been accepted to a doctoral program in
physics at Louisiana State University, when she saw a flyer for a new Ph.D.
program at the University of Texas at San
Antonio, she decided to apply. “I liked
the idea of studying at the secondlargest
campus in the UT system, and I
wanted to be one of the first students to
graduate from a new program,” Nash
says. “I wanted to have a chance to leave
an impression.”
Her current research interest is in fabricating
nanocrystals — clusters of atoms
that are less than the thickness of a human
hair. She’s in solid-state physics, which
means she studies elements in their solid
form, and the ones she works with are the
rare-earth elements. The laboratory study
of crystals has more than one purpose,
Nash says. There’s the pure-physics aspect,
delving into the true physical nature of
these materials that are between molecules
and bulk solids in size and are nearly
all surface, with physical and chemical
properties that change as the crystals grow
larger. “Studying them at the true atomic
level,” she says, “may lead to discoveries
that will help other scientists and to develop
new technologies.”
The most practical application may be
in optics, where nanocrystals have potential
for use in new laser systems and as
biosensors. Because these crystals give
off light for a long time, it may be possible
someday to devise a way to attach
them to human cells — such as cancer
cells — to aid in medical diagnoses. “If
the crystals can be successfully integrated
with biological media,” says Nash, “they may someday be more effective
than injectable dyes.”
The field of optics is “a huge area,” she
says. “I’ve been to two conferences since
January, and there were many more people
attending than in previous years.” Both
the medical and military communities look
to optics for advances, Nash says, and the
discipline has demonstrated commercial
potential. “Innovations such as plasmascreen
televisions started in a physics lab,”
she says, and such well-publicized successes
have drawn interest from students,
funding agencies and corporations.
Nash hopes to stick with optics for the
time being, perhaps continuing with some
aspect of her current research topic. After
she graduates next year, the next step is to
go on to a postdoctoral fellowship at UTSA
or another university. Her research area is “inexpensive to monitor and doesn’t
require a lot of equipment,” she says.
During a post-doc year or two, she hopes
to publish papers and apply for grants.
With those accomplishments in place, she
can apply for a university teaching position,
with her research already funded. “That makes (a candidate) more attractive
to the institution,” she explains.
Not every female scientist who makes
it to a tenure-track position chooses to
stay on it, Nash has learned. “I’ve met
women who have chosen to start their
families before getting tenure,” she says, “and I’ve met others who have put off
getting married and having children until
they have achieved that goal.”
She’s not sure which path she wants to
take. “I’ll deal with that (decision) when it
comes up,” she says. She’d also like to
teach at a minority-serving institution
someday — “maybe after I retire (from
another academic post), or maybe sooner.”
Right now, Nash doesn’t have a lot of
time for a personal life. Her adviser publishes
a lot of papers, as many as 10 to
12 a year, and she has been credited on
a few. Now she’s working toward publishing
her “first first-author paper.” In a
typical day, she keeps up her e-mail correspondence, reads the most recent liter- W
ature in her field, checks on the progress
of her crystals, records and analyzes data,
teaches a lab, goes home and prepares
for the next day’s work.
Some days, she says, “I work so hard, I
can’t think anymore, but when I wake up,
I’m ready to start over again.” Though
being an instructor adds to her workload,
she says, “I love teaching basic labs! It
refreshes me, and if you can teach fundamentals
to people who might not have
encountered them before, you can explain
anything to anybody.”
However she progresses, Nash is comfortable
in the role of a trailblazer. She
declares it subtly in the tagline to her email
messages, a quote from The Road
Not Taken, by Robert Frost: “Two roads
diverged in a wood, and I/I took the one
less traveled by,/And that has made all
the difference.”
Her correspondents often remark on
the lines, she says. They admire the
poem’s spirit. Nash lives it.